🔗 Share this article

Internationally, states are pouring hundreds of billions into what's termed “sovereign AI” – building their own machine learning models. Starting with Singapore to the nation of Malaysia and Switzerland, states are racing to create AI that grasps local languages and local customs.

The Global AI Competition

This movement is part of a larger worldwide race led by tech giants from the America and the People's Republic of China. While firms like OpenAI and a social media giant pour enormous funds, mid-sized nations are also making independent investments in the AI landscape.

Yet amid such huge investments at stake, is it possible for smaller nations secure meaningful advantages? As stated by an expert from a well-known research institute, If not you’re a wealthy government or a big company, it’s a significant burden to create an LLM from scratch.”

Defence Concerns

Many nations are reluctant to use external AI systems. Throughout the Indian subcontinent, for instance, Western-developed AI tools have at times fallen short. An illustrative instance saw an AI agent used to teach pupils in a remote area – it interacted in the English language with a pronounced US accent that was difficult to follow for local users.

Additionally there’s the national security aspect. In India’s military authorities, relying on certain international models is viewed not permissible. According to a founder noted, “It could have some arbitrary data source that might say that, oh, a certain region is separate from India … Utilizing that particular system in a military context is a big no-no.”

He added, “I have spoken to individuals who are in the military. They aim to use AI, but, forget about certain models, they are reluctant to rely on American platforms because information may be transferred abroad, and that is completely unacceptable with them.”

National Efforts

In response, a number of nations are funding local projects. An example such initiative is underway in the Indian market, in which a firm is working to develop a domestic LLM with public support. This initiative has committed approximately 1.25 billion dollars to machine learning progress.

The founder imagines a AI that is significantly smaller than top-tier tools from Western and Eastern firms. He explains that India will have to make up for the funding gap with expertise. Located in India, we do not possess the advantage of investing huge sums into it,” he says. “How do we compete versus for example the enormous investments that the US is investing? I think that is where the key skills and the strategic thinking is essential.”

Local Emphasis

Throughout the city-state, a public project is supporting language models trained in the region's local dialects. These particular languages – including the Malay language, Thai, Lao, Bahasa Indonesia, the Khmer language and additional ones – are often underrepresented in American and Asian LLMs.

I hope the experts who are creating these independent AI systems were conscious of how rapidly and how quickly the frontier is advancing.

A senior director involved in the project explains that these systems are created to enhance bigger systems, rather than substituting them. Systems such as ChatGPT and another major AI system, he comments, often struggle with local dialects and local customs – speaking in stilted Khmer, for instance, or suggesting non-vegetarian recipes to Malay consumers.

Building native-tongue LLMs enables local governments to code in cultural nuance – and at least be “smart consumers” of a sophisticated system built overseas.

He adds, I am prudent with the term national. I think what we’re trying to say is we aim to be better represented and we wish to comprehend the features” of AI technologies.

Multinational Collaboration

For states attempting to carve out a role in an growing worldwide landscape, there’s a different approach: team up. Researchers associated with a respected policy school recently proposed a state-owned AI venture distributed among a consortium of middle-income states.

They term the proposal “Airbus for AI”, drawing inspiration from the European productive initiative to develop a rival to Boeing in the mid-20th century. The plan would involve the formation of a government-supported AI organization that would merge the capabilities of different nations’ AI projects – for example the United Kingdom, Spain, the Canadian government, Germany, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, France, the Swiss Confederation and Sweden – to create a strong competitor to the American and Asian major players.

The main proponent of a paper outlining the proposal notes that the proposal has attracted the attention of AI ministers of at least several nations up to now, in addition to several sovereign AI companies. While it is now targeting “middle powers”, emerging economies – the nation of Mongolia and the Republic of Rwanda for example – have likewise indicated willingness.

He comments, Currently, I think it’s just a fact there’s less trust in the commitments of this current White House. Experts are questioning such as, is it safe to rely on these technologies? What if they choose to